Research Article

Exploring the determinants of the global massive open online courses for diminishing diversified gender discrimination

Ai-Chieh Chang 1, Chien-Hui Lee 2, Jiin-Chyuan Mark Lai 3, Chun-Ming Shih 1, Ming-Yuan Hsieh 4 *
More Detail
1 Graduate School of Human Sexuality, Shu-Te University2 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology3 Department of Applied Foreign Languages, TransWorld University4 Department of International Business, National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 5(1), March 2025, 6-14, https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2025v05.01.0002
Submitted: 03 October 2024, Published: 30 March 2025
OPEN ACCESS   87 Views   63 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research investigates the effectiveness of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in addressing diversified gender discrimination in the post-sexism era. A mixed-methods approach is employed to explore gender education within global MOOCs, drawing from theoretical perspectives such as feminist pedagogy, intersectionality theory, social constructivism, and post-structuralist gender theory. Hence, the quantitative data, including MOOC enrollment, completion rates, participant demographics, and survey responses, will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data will be collected through content analysis, interviews, and focus groups, and analyzed using thematic analysis, critical discourse analysis, and comparative analysis. Ethical considerations, such as informed consent and cultural sensitivity, will be prioritized. Finally, the potential limitations include language barriers, self-selection bias, and researcher bias. By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, this research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities of using MOOCs for gender education, contributing to the ongoing efforts to address gender discrimination.
Keywords: Diversified gender discrimination (DGD), Global massive open online courses (MOOCs), Post-sexism period

CITATION (APA)

Chang, A.-C., Lee, C.-H., Lai, J.-C. M., Shih, C.-M., & Hsieh, M.-Y. (2025). Exploring the determinants of the global massive open online courses for diminishing diversified gender discrimination. Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 5(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2025v05.01.0002

REFERENCES

  1. Albertyn, C., Fredman, S., & Fudge, J. (2014). Introduction: elusive equalities – sex, gender and women. International Journal of Law in Context, 10(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552314000196.
  2. Bacolod, M. (2017). Skills, the Gender Wage Gap, and Cities. Journal of Regional Science, 57(2), 290–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12285
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819–823. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1115455.
  4. Biroli, F. (2018). Violence against Women and Reactions to Gender Equality in Politics. Politics & Gender, 14, 681–685. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/violence-against-women-and-reactions-to-gender-equality-in-politics/AB6B5150F6E594BEA41A3A96879CAAEE#
  5. Blau, F. D.,& Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender Differences in Pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75–99. https: //doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.75
  6. Borrowman, M., & Klasen, S. (2020). Drivers of Gendered Sectoral and Occupational Segregation in Developing Countries. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 62–94. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2019.1649708.
  7. Cascella, C., Williams, J., & Pampaka, M. (2022). An Extended Regional Gender Gaps Index (eRGGI): Comparative Measurement of Gender Equality at Different Levels of Regionality. Social Indicators Research, 159, 757–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02764-x
  8. Charles, M., & Bradley K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of research in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4):924–976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19824299/
  9. Charlesworth, T.E.S., & Banaji, M.R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: long-term change in gender stereotypes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1) 14 –26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620988425 journals.sagepub.com/home/spp
  10. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007.
  11. Chen, W.-F., Chan, Y.-K., Chang, W.-H., & Hsieh, M.Y. (2024). Pediatric Life Support in Prehospital Emergency Medicine: An Empirical Investigation in the Context of Taiwan’s Critical Shortage of Pediatric Emergency Specialists, Discovery Medicine, 36(187), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.156.
  12. Darwin, H. 2020. Challenging the cisgender/transgender binary: nonbinary people and the transgender label. Gender & Society, 34(3), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220912256
  13. di Bella, E., Leporatti, L., Gandullia, L., & Maggino, F. (2021). Proposing a regional gender equality index (R-GEI) with an application to Italy. Regional Studies, 55(5), 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1836341.
  14. Di Noia, J. (2002). Indicators of Gender Equality for American States and Regions: An Update. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 35–77. url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 27527021.
  15. Dray, K. K, Smith, V. R. E., Kostecki, T. P., Sabat, I. E., & Thomson, C. R. (2020). Moving beyond the gender binary: examining workplace perceptions of nonbinary and transgender employees. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(6), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12455
  16. Elhorst, J. P. (2008). A spatiotemporal analysis of aggregate labour force behaviour by sex and age across the European Union. Journal of Geographical Systems, 10, 167–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-008-0061-9.
  17. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2005). The bare bones of sex: part 1—sex and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(2), 1491–1527. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/424932
  18. Goldberg, S. K., Rothblum, E. D., Russell, S. T., & Meyer, I. H. (2020). Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: demographic characteristic and sexuality of queer people in a US representative sample of sexual minorities. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers, 7(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/101–112. 10.1037/sgd0000359
  19. Gonsalves, T. (2020). Gender identity, the sexed body, and the medical making of transgender. Gender & Society, 34(6), 1005–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220965913
  20. Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: social change in academic titles, 1945–2001. Archives of Sexual Behavior,33(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:aseb.0000014323.56281.0d
  21. Hammack et al (2022). Gender and sexual identity in adolescence: a mixed-methods research of labeling in diverse community settings. Journal of Adolescent Research, 37(2), 167–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211000315
  22. Hatch, H. A., Warner, R. H., Broussard, K. A, & Harton, H. C. (2022). Predictors of transgender prejudice: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 87(11), 583–602. https://andifugard.info/predictors-of-transgender-prejudice-a-meta-analysis/
  23. Heidari, S., Babor, T. F., De Castro, P., Tort, S., & Curno, M. (2016). Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
  24. Heintz, J., Kabeer, N., & Mahmud, S. (2018). Cultural norms, economic incentives and women’s labour market behaviour: Empirical insights from Bangladesh. Oxford Development Studies, 46(2), 266-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2017.1382464
  25. Henderson, E. R., Blosnich, J. R., Herman, J. L., & Meyer, I. H. (2019). Considerations on sampling in transgender health disparities research. LGBT Health, 6(6), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2019.0069
  26. Hsieh, M.Y. (2024). An empirical investigation into the enhancement of decision-making capabilities in corporate sustainability leadership through Internet of Things (IoT) integration. Internet of Things 28(2024), 101382–101397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101382.
  27. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.-Y., & Lai, J.-C. M. (2023)-a. Empirical Research on the Sustainable Development of Ecotourism with Environmental Education Concepts. Sustainability, 15(13),10307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310307
  28. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.-Y., & Lai, J.-C. M (2023)-c. Empirical Research on the Sustainable Development of Ecotourism with Environmental Education Concepts. Sustainability, 15(13), 10307-10322. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su151310307.
  29. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., & Hsieh, M.Y. (2023)-b. Research on the International Sustainable Practice of the Taiwanese Food and Agricultural Education Law under the Current Global Food Security Challenges. Foods 12(14), 2785–2805. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/foods12142785\
  30. Hyde, J.S., Bigler, R.S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
  31. Kao, C., Polachek, S. W. , & Wunnava, P. V. (1994). Male-Female Wage Differentials in Taiwan: A Human Capital Approach. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42(2),351–374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1154446.
  32. Khanna, K, & Meadow, T. (2023). The fragile male: an experimental research of transgender classification and the durability of gender categories. Gender & Society, 37(4), 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231180152
  33. Kolber, J. (2023). Gender Category and Gender Status: A Critical Distinction. Symbolic Interaction, 46(4), 417–4390. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.665
  34. Lei, M. K., Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Edmond, M. B. (2014). Gender Equality and Violent Behavior: How Neighborhood Gender Equality Influences the Gender Gap in Violence. Violence and Victims, 29(1), 89–108. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/29901
  35. Lewis, D. C., Flores, A. R., Haider-Markel, D. P., Miller. P. R., & Taylor, J. K. (2022). Transitioning opinion? Assessing the dynamics of public attitudes toward transgender rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 86(2), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac014
  36. Lorber, J. (1996). Beyond the binaries: depolarizing the categories of sex, sexuality, and gender. . Sociological Inquiry, 66(2),143–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1996.tb00214.x
  37. Lundborg, P., Plug, E., & Rasmussen, A. W. (2017). Can women have children and a career? IV evidence from IVF treatments. American Economic Review, 107(6), 16111637. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141467
  38. Martin, A. E, & Slepian, M. L. (2021). The primacy of gender: gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6),1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904961
  39. Martin, A. E., & Mason, M. F. (2022). What does it mean to be (seen as) human? The importance of gender in humanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(2), 292–315. 10.1037/pspa0000293
  40. Meurs, M., & Giddings, L. (2021). Elder care and paid work: Gender differences in the relationship between unpaid elder care work and employment in Bulgaria. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720974181
  41. Mishel, E., England, P., Ford, J., & Caudillo, M. L. (2020). Cohort increases in sex with same-sex partners: Do trends vary by gender, race, and class? Gender & Society, 34(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219897062
  42. Monro et al. (2021). Intersex: cultural and social perspectives. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 23(4), 431-440, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1899529
  43. Morrissey, T. W. (2017). Child care and parent labor force participation: A review of the research literature. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9331-3
  44. Nordmarken, S. (2023). Coming into identity: how gender minorities experience identity formation. Gender & Society, 37(4), 584–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231172992
  45. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981
  46. Peto, R.,& Reizer, B. (2021). Gender differences in the skill content of jobs. Journal of Population Economics, 34, 825–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-008256.
  47. Puckett, J.A., Tornello, S., Mustanski, B., & Newcomb, M.E. (2022). Gender variations, generational effects, and mental health of transgender people in relation to timing and status of gender identity milestones. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 9(2), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000391
  48. Ridgeway, C. L.,& Saperstein, A. (2024), Diversifying Gender Categories and the Sex/Gender System, Annual Review of Sociology, 50, 385–405. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-035327
  49. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269
  50. Ritz, S. A., & Greaves, L. (2022). Transcending the male-female binary in biomedical research: constellations, heterogeneity, and mechanism when considering sex and gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4083. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074083
  51. Rodriguez-Loureiro, L., Vives, A., Martínez Franzoni, J., & Lopez-Ruiz, M. (2020). Health inequalities related to informal employment: Gender and welfare state variations in the Central American region. Critical Public Health, 30(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1559923
  52. Russell, S. T., Bishop, M. D., & Fish, J. N. (2023). Expanding notions of LGBTQ+. Annual Review of Sociology, 49, 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-032256
  53. Seguino, S. (2000). Gender Inequality and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305750X(00)00018-8
  54. Shih, C.-M., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M. Y., & Meen, T.-H. (2023)-a. Acceptance and Use of Sensor Technology in Diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria. Sensors and Materials, 35(8), 2771–2782. https://sensors.myu-group.co.jp/sm_pdf/SM3353.pdf
  55. Shih, C.-M., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.Y., & Meen, T.-H. (2023)-b. Important Elements of Sensor Technology and Data Management and Related Education. Sensors and Materials, 35(4), 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4015.
  56. Springer, K. W., Mager Stellman, J., Jordan-Young, R. M. (2012). Beyond a catalogue of differences: a theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. Social Science & Medicine,74(11):1817–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.033
  57. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
  58. Sudai, M., Borsa, A., Ichikawa, K., Shattuck-Heidorn, H., Zhao, H., & Richardson, S. S. (2022). Law, policy, biology, and sex: critical issues for researchers. Science, 376(6595), 802–804. https://tinyurl.com/y6zd9eld
  59. Suen, L.W., Mitchell R Lunn, M.R., & Katuzny, K. et al., (2020). What sexual and gender minority people want researchers to know about sexual orientation and gender identity questions: a qualitative research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2301–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01810-y.
  60. Sumerau, J. E., & Lain, A. B. M. (2020). Foreclosing fluidity at the intersection of gender and sexual normativities. Symbolic Interaction, 43(2):205–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.431
  61. Van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2006). Gender differences in the creation of different types of social capital: A multilevel research. Social Networks, 28(1), 24–37. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/19135
  62. Vidal-Ortiz, S. (2008). Transgender and transsexual studies: sociology’s influence and future steps. Sociology. Compass, 2(2), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00086.x
  63. Westbrook, L. (2023). The matrix of violence: intersectionality and necropolitics in the murder of transgender people in the United States, 1990–2019. Gender & Society, 37(3):413–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243223117
  64. Westbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. (2015). New categories are not enough: rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29(4):534–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432155847
  65. Wirba, E. L., Akem, F. A., & Baye, F. M. (2021). Earnings gap between men and women in the informal labor market in Cameroon. Review of Development Economics, 25(3), 1466–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12765