Research Article

A Comprehensive Research on Online Technological Education Courses Education of Diversified Gender Equity

Ai-Chieh Chang 1, Jiin-Chyuan Mark Lai 2, Chien-Hui Lee 3, Chun-Ming Shih 1, Ming-Yuan Hsieh 4 1 *
More Detail
1 Graduate School of Human Sexuality, Shu-Te University2 Department of Applied Foreign Languages, TransWorld University3 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology4 Department of International Business, National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 4(4), 2024, 18-27, https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2024v04.04.0003
Published: 30 December 2024
OPEN ACCESS   39 Views   26 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research examines the complex landscape of diversified gender equality within educational systems, revealing both progress and persistent challenges. Through a comprehensive analysis, the research identifies key areas of concern: representation and inclusion, accessibility and accommodations, pedagogical approaches, learner experiences, and long-term impacts of gender-focused initiatives. Findings indicate that while advancements have been made in incorporating diverse gender identities into policies and curricula, significant disparities persist in fostering genuine validation and belonging for learners across the gender spectrum. Support for transgender, non-binary, and genderqueer students remains inconsistent across institutions, with many struggling to provide comprehensive services and inclusive facilities. Implementation of gender-sensitive and gender-transformative teaching methods is variable, indicating room for improvement in pedagogical practices. Based on these findings, the research proposes a multifaceted approach to enhance diversified gender equality in education. Recommendations include prioritizing visibility and validation of diverse gender identities, improving accessibility and accommodations, enhancing educator training in gender-sensitive pedagogies, strengthening institutional policies addressing gender equality and bias, and fostering collaborative partnerships with stakeholders. Eventually, the research underscores the importance of holistic interventions to create truly inclusive and equitable learning environments. Future research directions include longitudinal studies to assess long-term impacts and exploration of intersectional approaches considering the interplay of gender with other aspects of identity and social positioning.
Keywords: Diversified gender equality, Online technological education courses (OTECs), Document method, Literature method

CITATION (APA)

Chang, A.-C., Lai, J.-C. M., Lee, C.-H., Shih, C.-M., & Hsieh, M.-Y. (2024). A Comprehensive Research on Online Technological Education Courses Education of Diversified Gender Equity. Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 4(4), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2024v04.04.0003

REFERENCES

  1. Abualtaher, M., Rustad, T., & Bar, S. (2021). Insights on the integration of UN sustainable development goals within the Norwegian Salmon value chain. Applied Sciences. 11(24), 12042. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112412042
  2. Agarwal, B. (2018). Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.002
  3. Aipira, C., Kidd, A., & Morioka, K. (2017). Climate change adaptation in pacific countries: fostering resilience through gender equality. (W. Leal Filho (Ed.), In Climate change adaptation in pacific countries. Climate Change Management. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50094-2_13
  4. Asperholm, M., Nagar, S., Dekhtyar, S., & Herlitz, A. (2019). The magnitude of sex differences in verbal episodic memory increases with social progress: data from 54 countries across 40 years. PLoS One, 14, e0214945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0214945
  5. Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112795
  6. Barreiro‑Gen, M., Lozano, R., Temel, M,. & Carpenter, A. (2021). Gender equality for sustainability in ports: developing a framework. Marine Policy, 131, 104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104593
  7. Beckwith, K. (2005). A common language of gender? Pol Gender, 1, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X05211017
  8. Blackburn, R. M.,& Jarman, J. (2006). Gendered occupations: exploring the relationship between gender segregation and inequality. International Sociology, 21, 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906061380
  9. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
  10. Charles, M., Harr, B., Cech, E., & Hendley, A. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24, 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.895140
  11. Chen, W.-F., Chan, Y.-K., Chang, W.-H., & Hsieh, M.Y. (2024). Pediatric Life Support in Prehospital Emergency Medicine: An Empirical Investigation in the Context of Taiwan’s Critical Shortage of Pediatric Emergency Specialists, Discovery Medicine, 36(187), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.156.
  12. Clavero, S., & Galligan, Y. (2021). Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 1115-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12658
  13. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
  14. Dekhtyar, S., Weber, D., Helgertz, J., & Herlitz, A. (2018). Sex differences in academic strengths contribute to gender segregation in education and occupation: a longitudinal examination of 167,776 individuals. Intelligence, 67, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017. 11.007
  15. Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2023). Blockchain technology and gender equality: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102517
  16. Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01598.x
  17. Eagly, A. H., & Mitchell, A. A. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: implications for the sociopolitical attitudes of women and men. (M. A. Paludi (Ed.), In Praeger guide to the psychology of gender. Santa Barbara, CA, USA.: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-21898-009
  18. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408 E
  19. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (London: SAGE Publications Ltd), 458–476
  20. Enaifoghe, A., & Idowu, T.A. (2021). The attitudes and perceptions toward sexuality and the social influence on gender-based violence in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 153-170. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ajpa_v12_n1_a10
  21. Falk, A., & Hermle, J. (2018). Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science, 362, eaas9899. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9899
  22. Fors Connolly, F., Goossen, M., & Hjerm, M. (2020). Does gender equality cause gender differences in values? Reassessing the gender-equality-personality paradox. Sex Roles, 83, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01097-x
  23. Freiberg, T. (2019). Effects of care leave and family social policy: spotlight on the United States. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78, 1009–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12293
  24. Ganley, C. M., & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). Sex differences in the relation between math performance, spatial skills, & attitudes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. appdev.2011.04.001
  25. Gartzia, L. (2021). Gender equality in business action: a multi‑agent change management approach. Sustainability, 13(11), 6209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116209
  26. Gevrek, Z. E., Gevrek, D., & Neumeier, C. (2020). Explaining the gender gaps in mathematics achievement and attitudes: the role of societal gender equality. Economics of Education Review, 76, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101978
  27. Hartman, R.L., & Barber, E.G. (2020). Women in the workforce: The effect of gender on occupational self-efficacy, work engagement and career aspirations. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(1), 92-118. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/GM-04-2019-0062/full/html
  28. Hsieh, M.Y. (2024). An empirical investigation into the enhancement of decision-making capabilities in corporate sustainability leadership through Internet of Things (IoT) integration. Internet of Things 28(2024), 101382–101397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101382.
  29. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.-Y., & Lai, J.-C. M. (2023)-a. Empirical Research on the Sustainable Development of Ecotourism with Environmental Education Concepts. Sustainability, 15(13),10307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310307
  30. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.-Y., & Lai, J.-C. M (2023)-c. Empirical Research on the Sustainable Development of Ecotourism with Environmental Education Concepts. Sustainability, 15(13), 10307-10322. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su151310307.
  31. Huang, C.-C., Li, S.-P., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., & Hsieh, M.Y. (2023)-b. Research on the International Sustainable Practice of the Taiwanese Food and Agricultural Education Law under the Current Global Food Security Challenges. Foods 12(14), 2785–2805. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/foods12142785\
  32. Hyde, J. S. (2012). Nation-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research: theoretical and methodological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312441448
  33. Inhetveen, K. (1999). Can gender equality be institutionalized? The role of launching values in institutional innovation. International Sociology, 14(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014004002
  34. Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 91–132. https://doi. org/10.1080/13545700902893106
  35. Lawless, S., Cohen, P.J., Mangubhai, S., Kleiber, D., & Morrison, T.H. (2021). Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Development, 140, 105348. https://ssfhub.org/resource/gender-equality-diluted-commitments-made-small-scale-fisheries
  36. Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10508-008-9460-8
  37. Mac Giolla, E., & Kajonius, P. J. (2019). Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: replicating and extending a surprising finding. International Journal of Psychology, 54, 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12529
  38. Morgan, R., Dhatt, R., Kharel, C., & Muraya, K. (2020). A patchwork approach to gender equality weakens the SDGs: Time for cross-cutting action. Global Health Promotion, 27(3), 3–5. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1757975920949735
  39. Murphy, S. A., Fisher, P. A., & Robie, C. (2021). International comparison of gender differences in the five-factor model of personality: an investigation across 105 countries. Journal of Research in Personality, 90, 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104047
  40. Shih, C.-M., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M. Y., & Meen, T.-H. (2023)-a. Acceptance and Use of Sensor Technology in Diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria. Sensors and Materials, 35(8), 2771–2782. https://sensors.myu-group.co.jp/sm_pdf/SM3353.pdf
  41. Shih, C.-M., Lai, J.-C. M., Chan, Y.-K., Hsieh, M.Y., & Meen, T.-H. (2023)-b. Important Elements of Sensor Technology and Data Management and Related Education. Sensors and Materials, 35(4), 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4015.
  42. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364
  43. Thomson, A., Palmén, R., Reidl, S., Barnard, S., Beranek, S., Dainty, A.R.J., & Hassan, T.M. (2022). Fostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research: the case of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804
  44. van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). Gender segregation across fields of research in postsecondary education: trends and social differentials. European Sociological Review, 33, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx040
  45. van Staveren, I. (2013). To measure is to know? A comparative analysis of gender indices. Rev. Soc. Econ. 71, 339–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2012.707398
  46. Vianello, M., Schnabel, K., Sriram, N., & Nosek, B. (2013). Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 994–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2013.08.008
  47. Vishkin, A. (2022). Queen’s gambit declined: the gender-equality paradox in chess participation across 160 countries. Psychological Science, 33, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211034806
  48. Wojniak, J. (2017). Responsible research and innovation. How to put gender equality into practice? Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2(38):163–176. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968ZP.16.014.7229
  49. Wong, Y. L. A., & Charles, M. (2020). Gender and occupational segregation in Companion to Women’s and Gender Studies. ed. N. A. Naples (Oxford: Wiley), 303–325.
  50. Workneh, M. A. (2020). Gender inequality governance, & poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Poverty and Public Policy, 12(2), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.278