Research Article

Empowering the Next Generation of Engineers: Design Fairs as Catalysts for Creativity and Problem-Solving

Wai Yie Leong 1 *
More Detail
1 Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia* Corresponding Author
Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 6(1), March 2026, 25-34, https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2026v06.01.0003
Submitted: 17 May 2025, Published: 30 March 2026
OPEN ACCESS   161 Views   49 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Design fairs are increasingly recognized as essential components in engineering education, providing platforms for students to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world contexts, fostering creativity, and cultivating problem-solving skills. This paper examines the role of design fairs as catalysts for developing critical engineering competencies, focusing on how these events empower students to take on complex challenges, innovate, and refine their practical skills. Through an analysis of multiple case studies from engineering programs worldwide, we investigate the educational impact of design fairs on students' creativity, teamwork, and technical proficiency. The study reveals that participating in design fairs not only enhances students' ability to ideate and prototype solutions but also boosts confidence, resilience, and adaptability in tackling open-ended problems. Additionally, the exposure to industry mentors and real-world feedback in these settings accelerates learning and prepares students for the demands of professional engineering roles. Key findings highlight that design fairs encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, foster a growth mindset, and inspire entrepreneurial thinking, positioning students as proactive creators rather than passive learners. This paper underscores the importance of integrating design fairs into engineering curricula and offers recommendations for educators to maximize their educational value, ultimately empowering the next generation of engineers to become creative, solution-oriented innovators.
Keywords: Engineering education, Problem-Solving, Next Generation of Engineers, Process innovation, Artificial intelligence

CITATION (APA)

Leong, W. Y. (2026). Empowering the Next Generation of Engineers: Design Fairs as Catalysts for Creativity and Problem-Solving. Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 6(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2026v06.01.0003

REFERENCES

  1. Aikina, T. Y., Bolsunovskaya, L. M., Phillips, C., Zubkova, O. M., Mitchell, P. J., & Sumtsova, O. V. (2018). Collaborative learning at engineering universities: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 160–177.
  2. Avidov-Ungar, O., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2022). Typology of digital leadership roles tasked with integrating new technologies into teaching: Insights from metaphor analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 92–107.
  3. Feille, K., & Wildes, A. N. (2021). "It's hard, but I can do it": How an independent engineering fair project can affect student perceptions of science. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(1), 23–33.
  4. Fila, N., McKIlligan, S., & Guerin, K. (2018). Design thinking in engineering course design. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 2018.
  5. Häkkinen, J., Ihantola, P., Luukkainen, M., Leinonen, A., & Leinonen, J. (2021). Persistence of time management behavior of students and its relationship with performance in software projects. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 92–100). August 16, 2021.
  6. Hickey, P. J., & Cui, Q. (2024). Tracing the career trajectories of architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) women leaders. Construction Management and Economics, 42(4), 289–306.
  7. Kulturel-Konak, S., Leung, A., & Konak, A. (2023). Perceived barriers and costs associated with participation in student innovation competitions. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 01–04). IEEE.
  8. Leong, W. Y. (2024a). Enhancing practical skills training through virtual reality in TVET education. In 2024 International Conference on TVET Excellence & Development (ICTeD), Malaysia, December 16–17, 2024.
  9. Leong, W. Y., & Zhang, J. B. (2024b). Failure analysis for project-based learning (PBL) in engineering. ASM Science Journal, 19, 1-12.
  10. Leong, W. Y. (2025a). Enhancing student engagement in virtual classrooms using gamification. In 14th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT 2025), Guangzhou, China, March 14–16, 2025.
  11. Leong, W. Y. (2025b). Beyond exams: Alternative evaluation methods to measure engineering competency. In 2025 IEEE 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation (IEEE ECEI 2025), Bali, Indonesia, February 6–8, 2025.
  12. Leong, W. Y. (2025c). Evaluating the impact of XR technologies on student performance in engineering labs. In 2025 IEEE 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation (IEEE ECEI 2025), Bali, Indonesia, February 6–8, 2025.
  13. Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers' engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1.
  14. Narong, D. K., & Hallinger, P. (2024). Traversing the evolution of research on engineering education for sustainability: A bibliometric review (1991–2022). Sustainability, 16(2), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020641
  15. Pflüger, D., Mehl, M., Valentin, J., Lindner, F., Pfander, D., Wagner, S., Graziotin, D., & Wang, Y. (2016). The scalability-efficiency/maintainability-portability trade-off in simulation software engineering: Examples and a preliminary systematic literature review. In *2016 Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering (SE-HPCCSE)* (pp. 26–34). IEEE.
  16. Secules, S. (2017). Putting diversity in perspective: A critical cultural historical context for representation in engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2017.
  17. Smatanová, K., Kamenská, M., & Šeligová, A. (2021). Effects of student architecture competitions on learning outcomes in design studio courses. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 19(3), 313–318.
  18. Tan, M. (2021). Making at scale: A development strategy for expanding access to progressive educational goals. In Scaling up ICT-based Innovations in Schools: The Singapore Experience (pp. 89–107).
  19. Wang, S., Zhen, X., Chen, J., & Li, D. (2023). The impact of guiding students to participate in skills competitions on the growth of young teachers. Scientific and Social Research, 5(5), 1–5.
  20. Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). "Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers' engineering design thinking." International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1.